Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As an alternative, we could have some boilerplate that specifically explains the situation to the upstream author when we encounter a bare "GPL" in the source code:
I emailed an upstream with a similar message yesterday when I encountered a COPYING file but no copyright/licensing-related comments in the source. They responded immediately agreeing that they should add copyright information, and even going so far as to ask my opinion on whether they should use a specific version of the GPL or not. (Wow, what a cooperative upstream.) FWIW, this was Coraid, upstream for aoetools and vblade.
I'm definitely a proponent of contacting upstream for clarification. Hopefully all of them will be so friendly, especially since clearing this up now could save them problems down the road.
Jima -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]