Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora! | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On 8/16/07, Simo Sorce <ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > /me imagines an angry author shouting at C violation by Fedora because > we mark something GPL+ instead of GPLv2+ or GPLv3+ Any upstream that would get in a huff over this should already be at our door with pitchforks and torches in hand for just using the string "GPL" in the past. As we clean it up I have no doubt we will get some of them wrong, but thats OKAY. I welcome as much communication as necessary with upstream developers to clarify exactly what variation of GPL is being used in more complicated cases. -jef -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
