Re: The open() system call in f8 really broken... | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Steve Dickson schrieb: > > > Colin Walters wrote: >> >> >> exportfs does not write setuid files, but it can cause a lost >> of thousand of dollars when a entire development department >> is idle because they can't log in because we decided to change >> the meaning of open()... it just does not make sense to me... >> >> >> Except that this error would have been caught way before it got to any >> kind of production environment because there's a test suite for >> it...right? > You know what they say about assumptions... ;-) > > Plus can one realistically test every single open in every single > application that runs in production? There is no question in my > mind that glibc calling abort will end bring down a very critical > application which in turn will bring down an entire production > environment... Its only a matter of time... imho... Bugs in the apps will be found, by abort() sooner than by warning out... And I don't expect any critical production system to go down over night.... There where other problems (I can remeber filesystem corruptions in older release) that where far more worse! > <sarcasm> > I bet the Open Solaris people are loving we are doing this... :-\ > </sarcasm> Open Solaris my a........ :-P -of -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]