Re: The open() system call in f8 really broken... | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
No. But if you want to make sure packages you built successfully
against glibc-2.6.90-* or later don't die at runtime for these errors,
it is pretty easy to just check all calls to __open{,at}{,64}_2
functions (i.e. calls which don't pass mode argument to open*
and it is not clear whether O_CREAT is or is not used at compile time),
they will be pretty rare and in each case you can study the code to
determine if the passed flags can contain O_CREAT or not. If they can,
you must supply the mode argument, if it can't, you are ok.
How about instead of aborting the process... just fail the open call with some like EINVAL? Would that accomplish the exact same thing? *Anything* is better than having glibc calling abort()... imho... steved. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
