Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora! | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:06:00 +0200 Tomas Janousek <tjanouse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If COPYING does not signal licensing intent, why "any version of the > GPL", why not "unknown license, if any" ? An unmodified COPYING file from FSF contains: "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
