Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 09:47 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > NOTE: COPYING does > not count as documentation, since the author(s) didn't write it. > 4. If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says > anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ > version > of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this > perspective. I am sure it is worth mentioning that this is true when COPYING is copied over mindlessly and not modified, while if it has obviously been modified by the author it counts as documentation. Simo. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]