Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Hi, On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:47:34AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > COPYING does not signal licensing intent (it might not seem intuitive, > but this is what Red Hat legal told us, and we're going by that). > > [...] > > 4. If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says > anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version > of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this > perspective. If COPYING does not signal licensing intent, why "any version of the GPL", why not "unknown license, if any" ? -- TJ. (Brno, CZ), BaseOS, Red Hat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]