Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:27:31AM -0400, Kelly wrote:
> On Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:11:20 am Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > So if sourcecode doesn't mention a version but COPYING does, it's still
> > interpreted as "or any later version?"  Hm... that strikes me as odd.
> 
> I BELIEVE what they're trying to say is that if both the source and COPYING 
> contain different licence numbers, the source trumps the COPYING file.

Take the most restrictive in tht case I think ?

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux