Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora! | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:27:31AM -0400, Kelly wrote: > On Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:11:20 am Eric Sandeen wrote: > > So if sourcecode doesn't mention a version but COPYING does, it's still > > interpreted as "or any later version?" Hm... that strikes me as odd. > > I BELIEVE what they're trying to say is that if both the source and COPYING > contain different licence numbers, the source trumps the COPYING file. Take the most restrictive in tht case I think ? -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]