Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora! | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hans de Goede wrote: > The version of the COPYING[.lib] file is not relevant if the sourcecoe doesn't > contain a version its GPL+ resp. LGPLv2+ So if sourcecode doesn't mention a version but COPYING does, it's still interpreted as "or any later version?" Hm... that strikes me as odd. > About GPL and LGPL. If libhandle is distributed as a seperate file under > /usr/lib, then the license tag would be: > > License: GPL+ and LGPLv2+ Yup that's it... I guess I'll look into making a -libs package in my spare time. :) Thanks, -Eric -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
