Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 23:01 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:Got your attention? Good. GPL and LGPL are NOT acceptable License tags for Fedora. You cannot simply use "GPL" or "LGPL" as a license tag anymore. You have to use one of the following tags: GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+, LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, LGPLv3, LGPLv3+seahorse contains both GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ components should I have it labeled as both?
That depends, do any of the build binaries contain only LGPLv2+ parts? If not, then the GPL trumps the LGPL and the license tag should be just:
License: GPLv2+If there are binaries which are build from LGPL code only, and these are in the same rpm, then it would be:
License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+However, assuming that the LGPL licensed stuff is a lib, which not only gets used during building, but also installed under /usr/lib, then please concider doing a -libs subpackage and use "License: GPL+" for the main package and "License: LGPLv2+" for the -libss and -devel sub-packages. The idea behind this tags is that interpackage licensing issues can be checked by a script, using:
License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+Is not going to help this script, resulting in people still needing to check things manually.
Regards,Hans (Who has 2 packages of his 150 left todo and then the License tagging operation is completed for me).
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]