Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora! | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> Please, please, please do this. Take a minute and go through your
> packages and correct the specs so that they are using the new
> License tagging schema.
FWIW, in the few weeks since the new guidelines were announced, ~1269
spec files have been updated. As of 2007-08-16 04:30 UTC, in the
devel branch:
72.81% of spec files (3392 out of 4659) have invalid licenses
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In my life, I have prayed but one prayer: oh Lord, make my enemies
ridiculous. And God granted it.
-- Voltaire
Attachment:
pgpaaSGHDOtwU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
