Licensing change: binutils GPLv2 -> GPLv3 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hi! Upstream binutils switched to GPLv3+ already more than a month ago. While I guess I can delay switch to binutils-2.17.50.0.18 for a few days, I can't do that forever. Under GPLv3+ will be licensed both the programs (I don't imagine how that could be a problem) but also libfd and libopcodes. Checking current rawhide, following packages BuildRequire binutils-devel and therefore very likely link against libbfd or libopcodes. Can the maintainers check if their licensing isn't incompatible with GPLv3+ licensed libbfd.a resp. libopcodes.a? Thanks. alleyoop frysk gcl kdesdk lush oprofile pfmon sblim-wbemcli sysprof Jakub -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
