Re: ocaml on 'non-intel-arch' (WAS: Re: Make ppc64 secondary arch - don't block builds)
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Once upon a time Tuesday 07 August 2007, Oliver Falk wrote: > Hi David! > > On 08/07/2007 09:26 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I think that's perhaps a little harsh in some cases. Take the blocker > > in Ralf's case, for example -- ocaml. I wouldn't necessarily expect a > > package maintainer to be willing and able to port its code generation > > back end to any new architecture which we happen to add to Fedora; > > that really is the job of the 'arch team'. > > [ ... ] > > I also see problems compiling ocaml on Alpha - maybe you can tell me > your progress on that? I have ocmal built on sparc. I will do some run time tests and see if it actually works. im thinking it will since ppc works. It is not built sparc64 yet. Dennis
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]