ocaml on 'non-intel-arch' (WAS: Re: Make ppc64 secondary arch - don't block builds) | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hi David! On 08/07/2007 09:26 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > I think that's perhaps a little harsh in some cases. Take the blocker > in Ralf's case, for example -- ocaml. I wouldn't necessarily expect a > package maintainer to be willing and able to port its code generation > back end to any new architecture which we happen to add to Fedora; > that really is the job of the 'arch team'. [ ... ] I also see problems compiling ocaml on Alpha - maybe you can tell me your progress on that? Best, Oliver -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
