Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: LGPLv2+ statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 05/26/2011 10:11 AM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I'd like to know if the following statement can be considered a LGPLv2+.
> I somehow cannot find the LGPLv2+ template.
> I found just LGPLv2 templates which differ a bit and since I'm unsure
> what the extra plus sign means, I considered it a good question
> for this mailing list.
> 
> /*
>  * Hibernate, Relational Persistence for Idiomatic Java
>  *
>  * Copyright (c) 2008, Red Hat Middleware LLC or third-party contributors as
>  * indicated by the @author tags or express copyright attribution
>  * statements applied by the authors.  All third-party contributions are
>  * distributed under license by Red Hat Middleware LLC.
>  *
>  * This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use, modify,
>  * copy, or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU
>  * Lesser General Public License, as published by the Free Software Foundation.

Yes, this is LGPLv2+, since no version is specified.

~tom

==
Fedora Project
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal


[Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net