Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>:The longer we wait the more it will look like a failure. Better beactive and tell the users that we're working on something than lettingthem find out by themselves by being bitten.That is what I was proposing. But it seems to have been met by silence. And I still have no idea myself what is going on.We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, wejust need to say that the current model is being reorganized and whiledoing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of maintenance. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.netSounds good. Someone who has edit rights should post something on the wiki, and others can then edit it or correct it or what ever... Due to the silence, I guess someone should just take this one and get the ball rolling... If _no one_ will step up to do it, I can do it by request, but since I have little actual understanding of what people want or where the project is allegedly going, I'm probably not the best person to do it.
I agree, and I've changed the Legacy page on the wiki. If someone can think of a better way to put it, please let me know.
-Jeff -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]