Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

[Jeff Sheltren <sheltren@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Eric Rostetter wrote:

> Quoting Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > The longer we wait the more it will look like a failure. Better be
> > active and tell the users that we're working on something than  
> > letting
> > them find out by themselves by being bitten.
>
> That is what I was proposing.  But it seems to have been met by
> silence.  And I still have no idea myself what is going on.
>
> > We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
> > just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and  
> > while
> > doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
> > maintenance.
> > --
> > Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
> Sounds good.  Someone who has edit rights should post something on the
> wiki, and others can then edit it or correct it or what ever...
>
> Due to the silence, I guess someone should just take this one and
> get the ball rolling...
>
> If _no one_ will step up to do it, I can do it by request, but since
> I have little actual understanding of what people want or where the
> project is allegedly going, I'm probably not the best person to do it.

I agree, and I've changed the Legacy page on the wiki.  If someone  
can think of a better way to put it, please let me know.

-Jeff

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list