Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:15 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 08:49, James Kosin wrote:I may have some critical things to say about participation; but, I still believe the community of participators can support a 6-12 month window with the FC releases fall aside. This will give those who choose to wait for a few months before upgrading the chance to keep up-to-date with security fixes while they wait.The Fedora project would be offering 13~ months of updates (security only for the last part), which gives you the opportunity to go from say Fedora 7 toFedora 9 + 1 month.
I like this idea, and I'd be happy to see official support for an FC release last ~13 months.
Of course, this would end all interest I have in Fedora Legacy, which at this point is mostly to allow upgrading (well, re-installing in my case) from FCN to FCN+2.
How much of this is just speculation at this point, and how close is this to being actual policy?
- -Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFWzU5Ke7MLJjUbNMRApSRAJ98qSe5tHDiKuKEPFcspi2Z/OtbOQCgzC5d liw9n163X6Sml5UR73JLUXo= =/0t0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]