Re: Fedora Core 4 Legacy security updates?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim Thome wrote: > David, > > Sounds like a good thing entering it into Bugzilla, however, if > there is not a priority within Red Hat to fix it, the bug will sit > there and rot... Might be a good time to split the bugzilla between > active devlopment and legacy, and move the bugs over as needed, > where they can be triaged, and dealt with in accordance with the > Fedora Legacy charter. > > Thoughts? > > Tim > Tim, (1) Don't top post.... (2) It use to be separate; but, I'm a little fuzzy as to why it was consolidated... but, it is separate in a since. You have to post it in the Legacy section of Bugzilla. (3) Redhat is not responsible for fixing the BUGs. It is the Fedora Legacy support group which is. Which comes right down to US in the end. Redhat manages and supports the group; but, it is the group of volunteers that support the updates. - -James -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFLOgekNLDmnu1kSkRAv7/AJ95lpwIqBxEsU9Ghnesr3+gH37S0ACfZEa9 VH5xnG1vYduqxLoAziAr73w= =8CEq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]