Re: Now that fc2 is retired, is there any valid yum repos? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 06:23, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote:I was afraid of that, but the last CentOS I pulled, 4.1, was even older than much of this heavily tarball updated FC2. I hate going backwards &Gene Heskett wrote:Plz see subject. I'd like to clean up my yum repo list as it appears some of the repos have disappeared. Are there any new ones for truely legacy stuff?I don't believe so. Fedora Core 2 is dead, you'll have to upgrade to a newer Fedora Core version (or migrate to something like CentOS if need a longer life cycle than Fedora's).then reinventing all these wheels again.
Is this a desktop workstation or a server? If this is a workstation or a non-production server, why not just go with the Fedora flow? I run Fedora Core 5 on my workstation and it's working just fine.
If you really don't like upgrading your OS every couple of months I'd backup my data and do a fresh install of CentOS 4.4. However, CentOS 5 will be out in 6 months... :o) No immediate need to upgrade then though as CentOS 4.x will get full updates until Feb 29 2008 and maintenance updates until Feb 29 2012 (http://www.centos.org/modules/ smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=42).
Nils Breunese. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]