Re: Fedora Core 4 coming . . . sunset, infrastructure issues . . . meeting?

["David Eisenstein" <deisenst@xxxxxxx>]

Let's not forget that we have a new way of marking bugs as security issues.  There
is no longer a severity of "Security," but now "Security" is one of the Bugzila
Keywords (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi).

        -David

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project" <fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 4 coming . . . sunset,infrastructure issues . . . meeting?


> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:54:57PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > Anyone have any opinion on this?
> > I would think be clear that we're interested only in security related bugs.
> 
> Yeah. Last time I actually went through the open security bugs and moved
> them to Legacy myself where appropriate; I'll probably do that again. I'll
> also look closely at those marked critical. The rest got this message:
> 
>   Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security
>   updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and
>   reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and
>   hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or in the FC4 test
>   release, reopen and change the version to match.
> 
> Which I'd plan to do again, with of course FC2 -> FC3/4, FC3 -> FC5, and FC4
> test -> FC6 test.
> 
> As before, I'll add myself to the CC list of each bug and help deal with
> anything that is stirred up, as of course the intent is cleanup, not more
> mess.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> 
> --
> 
> fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list