Re: Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Quoting Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 10:36:36AM -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:The talk when FL started was that RHL would be supported for a long time, specifically as long as there was interest in it.Well, personally I always understood that "... for as long as there will be people interested in _actively_ maitaining it and willing to commit resources, in whatever form, adequate to the task".
IMHO the majority of the people actively involved in the project have been from the RHL and FC1 camp. The real lack of involvement is in the distributions we're talking about keeping, IMHO. Amazing that you would pick that one part of my mail, a message which was overwhelming in favor of killing off the RHL line, and debate it like I was against killing off RHL.
Obviously maintaining old distros is getting harder and harder when they age.
Obviously. But that has nothing to do with the number of active contributors to the project, or what was originally expressed about the project at its formation.
If an interest is limited only to have somebody else to volunteer to do the work, and is voiced only when a support may be dropped, then this is obviously not sustainable.
This is not, IMHO, the case. But how you can respond this way to an e-mail which was 90% about why FL and users should all move off of RHL I don't understand.
-- Eric Rostetter The Department of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Go Longhorns! -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]