Re: Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2

[Jim Popovitch <jimpop@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Lawrence 'The Dreamer' Chen wrote:
>
> > Well, I was thinking that when I get settled after my upcoming 
> > relocation and my new job, that I wanted to see about building
> > another machine (because I plan to replace my W2K server) so I can
> > help with continuing support of RH73.
> >
> > Yes, my RH73 is also probably not quite stock...anymore....though
> > the upgrade from RH72 to RH73 wasn't really that long ago.  But, I
> > don't know about the worry about hardware failure.  Over the years
> > I've experienced failures...but the machine continues to run fine.
> > I'm on my 3rd root disk for the machine, the last I lost due to a
> > power outage just a few months ago.
>
> Is there a reason why you would go with RH 7.3 instead of RHEL or 
> something similar?  Why would you setup a machine with an OS that is
> already unsupported?

And being on your 3rd root disk, for the same machine, sounds a lot like 
hardware failure to me... and something to be worried about. ;-)

I take it you are just a home user of RH73, not someone who supports an 
organization or company of RH73 systems, right?

-Jim P.

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list