Re: Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Lawrence 'The Dreamer' Chen wrote:Well, I was thinking that when I get settled after my upcoming relocation and my new job, that I wanted to see about buildinganother machine (because I plan to replace my W2K server) so I can help with continuing support of RH73. Yes, my RH73 is also probably not quite stock...anymore....though the upgrade from RH72 to RH73 wasn't really that long ago. But, I don't know about the worry about hardware failure. Over the years I've experienced failures...but the machine continues to run fine. I'm on my 3rd root disk for the machine, the last I lost due to a power outage just a few months ago.Is there a reason why you would go with RH 7.3 instead of RHEL or something similar? Why would you setup a machine with an OS that isalready unsupported?
And being on your 3rd root disk, for the same machine, sounds a lot like hardware failure to me... and something to be worried about. ;-)
I take it you are just a home user of RH73, not someone who supports an organization or company of RH73 systems, right?
-Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]