Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
So in the RHL space, the choice was clear. Backport whenever possible. However the Fedora landscape is different. "Upstream" Core does not do backporting, they more often than not version upgrade to resolve security issues. Why should Legacy be any different? If we want to be transparent to end users we should follow what "upstream" does. Flames? Thoughts? -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]