Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Our hope is that if this proposal scares some people, it will scare them into finding ways to help out the project so that little to no packages escape updates-testing w/out some QA done on it.
My fear is that we spend more time arguing about these than we do testing. As I've said the last 3-4 times this came up; if each of us spent as much time QA testing packages as we do arguing about the QA processing on the mailing list, we wouldn't have any problem at all. I know these threads stop me from doing any QA while they are going on.
-- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-- Eric Rostetter The Department of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Go Longhorns! -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]