Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 02:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories
> for 
> testing and general legacy updates. Yes?

He is speaking in virtual terms.  Since we would introduce a timeout, he
is afraid that the quality of packages coming into released will be
lower than it is right now, and be considered "testing" packages.

IMHO the quality of packages hitting updates-testing is pretty on par
with the quality of packages hitting Fedora updates.  So I'm not so sure
what the problem is here.

Jesse Keating RHCE      (
Fedora Legacy Team      (
GPG Public Key          (

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]
Powered by Linux