Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 02:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories
> for 
> testing and general legacy updates. Yes?
> 

He is speaking in virtual terms.  Since we would introduce a timeout, he
is afraid that the quality of packages coming into released will be
lower than it is right now, and be considered "testing" packages.

IMHO the quality of packages hitting updates-testing is pretty on par
with the quality of packages hitting Fedora updates.  So I'm not so sure
what the problem is here.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Free Internet Dating]     [Yosemite Questions]

Powered by Linux