Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Mike McCarty wrote:
David Rees wrote:On 2/14/06, Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. Perhaps I misunderstood what the proposal is. My understanding is that there are new[snip]That is correct. However, if the necessary QA votes get published before the timeout hits, the package will be released sooner.Then the Legacy Project has removed my ability not to subscribe to "testing".
Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories for testing and general legacy updates. Yes?
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
[Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Free Internet Dating] [Yosemite Questions]