Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 22:34 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> The current policy change proposal was about reducing the amount of QA 
> for moving updates-testing packages to updates.
> 
> So, I'm not sure why we're having this conversation.. 

It is just a case of misunderstanding.  Generic terms regarding QA can
muddy the waters between updates-testing QA (phase 2?) and package
source QA (phase 1?).

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]
Powered by Linux