Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Benjamin Smith wrote:

With apologies to Benjamin Smith for replying "through"
his response.

On Sunday 12 February 2006 12:17, Pekka Savola wrote:

Hi,

It seems there's rather strong agreement for this.


Yep. (From me)

Unless I hear major objections in two days, I'll start the two-week clock (from today) for all the pending packages.

Ok then, it seems to me that there is no longer any distinction
between the released repository, and the test repository.
So, please send out an e-mail three days before the first
"timed release" so I can pull a last tested version before
removing the legacy repository from my yum configuration.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Free Internet Dating]     [Yosemite Questions]

Powered by Linux