RE: guesses on RH9 support lifetime?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:06:18PM -0500, David Anthrope wrote:
> > I see the notices about RH7-8 gone,
> 
> Really?  How about this one?
> 
> Advisory ID:       FLSA:2089
> Issue date:        2004-10-27


My bad - I misread the notice.

> It very much depends on you.  As long as there is enough of 
> people willing to maintain the given code then in could/would 
> be maintained.  Nobody can order you to stop.  If you are 
> asking for how long _others_ will be doing that - well, who knows?

I was just asking for opinions/guesses.

Yes I read the FAQ so I know the official stance,
I was only curious how long people thought it might last.

> Not enough of "bodies" were interested in RH8 to keep it.  In 
> any case it is not that different from RH9, which is in many 
> aspects better done than RH8, so updating is here a rather 
> simple solution.

Thank You

--
David Anthrope
mailto://David@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.DAnthrope.com
-- 

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux