|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:22:55AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote: > > your ideas for regression tests. Tests should be simple pass/fail > > checks. Tests against specific modules are allowed and encouraged. > > For > > users testing where they module is not loaded, the test will simply > > be > > skipped. Destructive testing is possible, though it will not be > > included in the standard test run (a user should know and explicitly > > sign up for a risk of data loss). Please take a look and add your > > ideas: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelRegressionTests > I am actually interesting in this efforts since my group is doing kernel > testing for a similar enterprise product. The natural thing to think is > to adopt tests that we used there for Fedora where possible. Does that > align with the community expectation here? If you have tests that can be split out into easily run, stand-alone test cases, then yes! As you can see from the wiki page, we're somewhat lacking for testcase ideas at the moment. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
[Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]