|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 01/11/2012 06:27 PM, Nicolas Viéville wrote: >> Didn't Chuck change it so LINUX_VERSION_CODE always calls itself 3.x >> now? If so, then you shouldn't need any cpp to consider 2.6.4x, as >> that's only for the utsname. > > If I understand correctly what you mean, this macro (on one line) > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0) || (LINUX_VERSION_CODE >> = KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 42) && LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 0, > 0)) > > would be equivalent and have the same behavior of this one > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0) > > in F-15 as in F-16? Yes, that should work. That change was made starting in the 2.6.41.3-1 package to leave LINUX_VERSION_CODE as the real 3.x version. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
[Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]