|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:26:18PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > > That is a bit troubling. I definitely want as much hardware support as > > > possible to be available in Fedora. I am particularly focused on > > > networking, so hopefully we do not move any reasonable wires or wireless > > > drivers out (which is essentially what happened when ssb was moved out). > > > > We pretty much left the network _hardware_ drivers alone. The ssb thing > > was unintentional. > > The cnic module seems to require uio. The lack of cnic is causing > the bnx2* drivers. > > FWIW, the llc module is causing the bridge module to go to extras. > > Applying something like my patch will let you be sloppy with the > mod-extra.list and still avoid these problems. Agreed. Your patch is now applied. We can work out the depmod or other enhancements later. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
[Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]