|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 08/09, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 08/09, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:35:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Dave, I'm afraid I can confuse you again. > > > > > > So, as Tony pointed out, both utrace-3.0 and utrace-3.1 need > > > this fix, to fix the build on !x86 platform. > > > > > > This is for utrace-3.0, I'll send the same patch in reply to > > > "[PATCH 0/31] utrace for 3.1 kernel". > > > > > > Or should I do something else? > > > > I'll just add this one on the end of the patches we already merged. > > > > sound good ? > > Yes, yes, this is what I am asing for ;) Ah, yes, but just in case... Please note that "[PATCH utrace-3.1 32/31]" differs a bit. The fix is the same, but context is different due to - int ptrace = task_ptrace(current); + int ptrace = current->ptrace; upstream change. Oleg. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
[Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]