|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 07/01, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Another attempt. This version tries to decouple utrace and ptrace. > This way it is much simpler to follow the upstream changes, afaics. It turns out, FC15's kernel 2.6.40 has the wrong utrace.patch See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728379 in short: PTRACE_SYEMU (used by uml) is broken. > TODO: > > - The single-stepping updates in ptrace_resume() can race > with utrace_reset()->user_disable_single_step(). > > This was fixed by 20/20, but I noticed that this patch > is buggy right before sending. > > - Perhaps PTRACE_SYSEMU/TIF_SYSCALL_EMU logic was broken, > I need to recheck. Yes, and then I sent the fixes for above, but they were not included. Dave, I am sorry. Looks like I managed to confuse you. I wrongly assumed you will simply pull the "utrace" branch, and thus I did not re-send the full series. I am (re)sending it now. Please let me now if you need the incremental diff against 2.6.40-*.fc15. Or anything else... (just in case, I verified that utrace-patch in rawhide is fine, it matches my utrace-3.1 branch). Oleg. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
[Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]