|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:54:29PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > The current test kernel is just a stock F15 kernel with a few config > changes, and a single patch to fig a power regulation bug. I think it > won't be too long before we can ask to get an official subpackage of the > main Fedora kernel to carry these bits rather than the interim test > status they have at the moment. But none of this was really why I sent > the mail :) We'll get to a point where Fedora ARM can use a single > standard kernel binary in due course, but until then (and for other use > cases) I think there's value in perhaps considering having a fake > provides kernel subpackage for those systems that need "kernel" deps but > aren't going to or cannot run the stock Fedora kernel. I'm clearly misunderstanding. If you have your own kernel images, why do you need the fake ones? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
[Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]