|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:14 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > What do the kernel maintainers think about having a kernel subpackage > that just provides fake deps as part of the main kernel package? Anyway. To get back to the point...there are some systems that cannot run a stock Fedora kernel yet or need fake kernel deps for other reasons. Is there any fundamental objection to the fake-kernel package being integrated by way of an official kernel sub-package? (perhaps even selectively buildable and not built by default on e.g. x86?). Jon. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
[Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Deep Creek Hot Springs] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Apps] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]
