Re: qt5 update?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/2013 10:52 AM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:

 From a user's point of view,  Qt 5 is not a drop-in replacement
for Qt 4

That's too bad :-(

It's not bad, but a good thing imo. Qt4/Qt5 is much like Qt3/Qt4 and gtk2/gtk3, they are different parallel-installable toolkits.

The good news is that api-wise Qt5 is relatively close to Qt4, so projects that want to use it generally dont have to change their code much (provided they weren't using any compat or deprecated interfaces).

-- Rex

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org





[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux