Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: new web app urls discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:57:57PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:53:09 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > http://tagger.fedoraproject.org/ 
> > and
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger/
> > and
> > https://tagger.fedoraproject.org
> > go to the tagger application. 
> > 
> > This means that we can't share signin on tagger, unless we move our
> > other applications that have login cookies under
> > apps.fedoraproject.org and make that the preferred url right?
> > 
> > Since we have that under admin. Should we instead put tagger: 
> > 
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/tagger/ 
> > 
> > At least for now until we move other applications that use admin?
> > 
> 
> 
> I would suggest NOT using admin.
> 
> 1. the name is utterly confusing to users. Admin.fp.o/blah  screams "GO
> AWAY THIS IS FOR NOT YOU" to me
> 2. Even if the user has to login separately, so be it. It's less
> intimidating to let the app be simple to see.
> 
> 
> 
> I'd rather move toward apps.* and start with tagger, personally.
>
wfm.

Also, we need to be sure that we're doing an external redirect and not an
internal rewrite to go from the other domain names to the
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger/  URL.  (otherwise sso won't work when
we eventually try to set it up).

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpV8VMpNwPVZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Home]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net