Re: font packages list | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Well, no policies to complain about it. that would be the sort of RFE in that sense so far. but would be a good idea. let me try. --- Akira TAGOH ----- 元のメッセージ ----- | Sorry late reply: | | ----- Original Message ----- | > for f16, http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/f16-defaultfonts.html | | > We should have certain aliases for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Thai at | > least. no aliases defined for those languages at all. | > | > Aside from that, some fonts packages being sorted out at "other" | > (and | > particularly is decorated by non-italic which would be installed by | > default regardless of languages) may have options to 1) assign any | > aliases to use it efficiently or 2) get rid of "mandatory" or | > "default" from comps otherwise. | | How about filing bugs for missing aliases that should be fixed? | A tracker bug may be good too? | | Jens _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
