Re: M+ fonts | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:03 +1000, "かいお (Kaio)" wrote:
> (CC'ed Tom 'spot' Callaway)
>
> (2009年11月10日 15:22), Igshaan Mesias wrote:
> > 2009/11/10 "かいお (Kaio)" <k@xxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> (2009年11月10日 05:15), Igshaan Mesias wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have packaged M+ family of fonts.
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/M%2B_fonts
> >>>
> >> I wonder if you could package it with alphanumeric name? such as mplus-fonts
> >> because I worry if usage of `+` could pass the package review. :)
> >>
> > The actual package name is 'mplus-fonts'. I have not made use of the
> > '+' for this very reason.
> >
> >
> Are all the fonts listed in
> http://www.geocities.jp/ep3797/modified_fonts_01.html members of mplus font?
>
> Also the license statements on
> http://mplus-fonts.sourceforge.jp/mplus-outline-fonts/#license in full?
>
> Could you persuade the author to release under GPL or any other better
> license?
>
> For legal issues please contact Tom 'spot' Callaway.
The mplus font license has already been listed as an approved
Fedora
font license:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Font_Licenses
So I don't know if it's worth having the author change it. Has
someone
spoke to him before? (I would worry about pestering him)
~m
_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]