Re: [389-devel] please review ticket #129 - Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops

[Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/07/2012 02:42 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> I had a typo in part of the fix, but...
>
> After looking at ticket #111, I think maybe we should add this flag to 
> memberOf, referint, and maybe some other plugins.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
If the concern is the audit trail, then when memberof, referint, etc. 
make some change to some other entry based on a change to the original 
entry, then the modifiersName should be the DN of the user that made the 
original change to the original entry that triggered the additional 
change.  Same with the modifyTimestamp.

However, for other uses e.g. updating the password policy failure 
attributes during a failed bind attempt, you might not want to update 
modifiersName and modifyTimestamp even though the entry was modified.
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> PS - having email issues again, so this is a duplicate
>
> On 02/07/2012 04:28 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> > Actually after looking at ticket #111, I think maybe we should add 
> > this flag to memberOf, referint, and maybe some other plugins.
> >
> > Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark 
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel