[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Fedora vs JPackage naming



On 02/17/2012 10:42 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Well, package xerces-j2 historically installed xerces-j2.jar, but it
should have been xercesImpl.jar all along because this is what
everything and everybody expects.
Well, xml libs are so many and so different that we all would live in a better world once projects learn to use the xml apis in the JDK. So the right fix for this one in my eyes is fix your project to not depend on xerces instead of care how is it packaged.

Alex

What "everybody expects" is a very large quantifier. I can just be a prick and say: hey, I did not expect that. ;-)

Depending on xerces might be a valid choice. I don't want to know the actual requirements or arguments. But we should just be providing choice.

In this case: use the existing xerces rpm or do it yourself in the way you like. :-)

Carlo
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel



[Home]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net