Re: Fedora vs JPackage naming

[Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/17/2012 10:10 AM, David Walluck wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 03:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > So the only solution that at least have chances to satisfy our needs is Ivy :).
> The point is that something as simple as
> %_javadir/<artifactId>-<version>.<extension>  probably satisfies 3 out of
> 4 requirements, and ivy also supports maven artifact patterns (really,
> it is just another location, which could be a simple symlink).
>
> So I would agree with you if supporting these crazy builds systems
> requires a lot (or even a little) extra work.
>
> But it seems to me that we get support for free (or at least as best we
> can, by sticking to the simple flat dir and naming structure above).
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel

I just would like to see maven artifacts 'properly' installed in 
/usr/share/maven/repository.
Then we can let upstream maven (and other tools) use that.

Carlo
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel