|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 11/03/2011 12:36 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> * Allow packager to override adding of "Requires: %{name}.." into
> javadoc (we do this if we don't find license file). This is useful
> when upstream has no separate license file
First, the License is supposed to be in the RPM header. Second, that is
already a Fedora policy. Third, most distros allow a common licenses
packages that has the full license text.
You want the documentation to require the full set of binaries just to
get the license file?
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
[Home] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]