[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: packaging apache parent poms



On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
<sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Excerpts from Andy Grimm's message of Fri Sep 02 20:42:49 +0200 2011:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jack Tanner <ihok@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > There's apparently precedent for bundling POMs:
>> >
>> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2504
>>
>> Yes there are precedents; in fact, I found (after starting this
>> thread) that the geronimo-parent-poms package in F16 contains POMs
>> related to genesis, but uses the 1.5 POMs rather than 2.0, so the
>> "flava" POMs aren't included.  Could geronimo-parent-poms be updated
>> to 2.0 ?
>
> So this doesn't get lost: file a bug in the bugzilla. I'll update it. I
> assume you'd like to have this also in F16, correct?

Yes.  I have filed this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736161

>
>> And as for apache-parent, somehow even though org.apache:apache is
>> referenced as a parent in numerous fedora-packaged POMs on my system,
>> it's not packaged anywhere that I could see.  I didn't think the child
>> POMs were functional without the parent, but I guess I have
>> misunderstood this.  Still, it seems reasonable to have apache-parent
>> packaged.
>
> You were correct in thinking that parent poms are required. We have it
> in package maven2-common-poms. This is one ugly pom-only package that
> used to contain 100s of POM files. We cut it down significantly, but
> there are still things in there. If you create a new parent package,
> that is currently contained in maven2-common-poms either file a bug to
> have old POM removed or ping me on IRC and I'll do it.

I see, I just didn't find the right directory of POMs.  I have created
apache-parent and filed a review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=736069

I noted in the review request that the old POM should be removed from
maven2-common-poms once this package is released.


>> --Andy
>>
>> > On 9/2/2011 2:01 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
>> >> The way that the POMs for the apache ecosystem are structured, it
>> >> looks like I'm going to need to package several levels of "parent"
>> >> POMs.  Something like:
>> >>
>> >> apache-parent
>> >> genesis-parent
>> >> genesis-default-flava
>> >> genesis-java5-flava
>> >>
>> >> Should each pom be separate, or is there a point at which it makes
>> >> sense to group some set of "apache-parent-poms"  together?  I can go
>> >> either way with it, but I want to put these up for review fairly soon,
>> >> and didn't want to file a bunch of separate reviews if they should all
>> >> just be bundled in a single package.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> --Andy
>> >> --
>> >> java-devel mailing list
>> >> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > java-devel mailing list
>> > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
>> >
>
> --
> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
>
> PGP: 7B087241
> Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com
>
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
>
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel



[Home]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net