> On 10/05/2010 12:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 10/05/2010 12:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> We'd like to migrate packages in Fedora from Tomcat5 to Tomcat6. I've > >> started a wiki page here: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java/TomcatMigration > >> > >> I still need to file bugs. > > > > Also, do we want to standardize on one or two tomcat6 provides? There > > are quite a lot of them! > > > > el_1_0_api = 6.0.26-8.fc14 > > el_api = 2.1 > > jsp21 > > jsp = 2.1 > > servlet25 > > servlet = 2.5 > > servlet6 > > tomcat6 > > Okay, about to file bugs but need to finalize the wording. Here's what I > have so far: > > We want to transition from tomcat5 to tomcat6. This package currently > depends on tomcat5 via one of the items tomcat5 provides, e.g.: > > * jsp_2_0_api > * servlet24 > * servlet_2_4_api > * servlet5 > * servletapi5 > * tomcat5 > * tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api > > Please migrate this package to tomcat6, which provides: > > > So I'd like to decide on one or two provides to list in the bug report for > packagers to use. Suggestions? Provides with underscores are difficult to write (at least for me). Provides locked to the tomcat version (e.g. servlet5) makes a virtual provide meaningless because tomcat versions are not equal to the servlet/jsp api versions. I would propose using the apinameMajorMinor versions only - servlet25, jsp21 and el10(elapi10??) which is missing as a provide now. Alex -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel