|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
sön 2010-07-11 klockan 11:13 +0200 skrev Chris Spike:
> On 07/08/2010 04:59 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Chris Spike <chris.spike@xxxxxxxx> [2010-07-08 06:43]:
> >> As long as there is an unversioned dir, I actually don't see any
> >> problems (or necessity for the versioned symlink), but I'm curious: Is
> >> there any recommendation on this?
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java
>
> Unfortunately not. Neither on Packaging:Java nor on the draft update[1]
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Abo/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
Yeah, the current guidelines do not say anything clear about it, but the
samples say %{name}. In the draft it says both ways are allowed, but
that doesn't really help much. The samples still say %{name}.
I don't have any strong opinion. %{name} is simpler, but
%{name}-%{version} in analogous with /usr/share/doc.
/Alexander
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
[Home] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
