Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: OpenNebula approved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 01/04/2012 06:29 PM, Jaime Melis wrote:
Hello Denis,

Thanks a lot for your help, it definitely cleared things up, and happily the process is simpler than what I though it would be, which is nice.

We've made the feature ready for wrangler.
Cool, I will take a look at it and send it over to FESCo for approval if it looks good. :)

Thanks!

-Robyn

Thanks again,
Jaime

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Jaime,



We're a few weeks away from F17 features submission deadline and we've been working hard (especially Shaw Starr - CC) in submitting OpenNebula package dependencies. OpenNebula would even work without those not yet complete dependencies since they're mostly ruby gems which speed up OpenNebula (although we're confident they will all be there for the submission deadline), so we would like to move on to the next stage and start submitting OpenNebula for feature review to get it approved. Could anyone help us out with the process we must follow to get OpenNebula to be an accepted feature?

AFAIU, you can submit the feature for approval by Fesco. There should be a Fesco meeting tonight, I believe. As a reminder, the feature process is described on the Fedora Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy. In particular, the acceptance criteria (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Acceptance) seem all be met by OpenNebula.
All the tasks of the feature are not required to be completed for the feature approval. Rather, they need to be completed for the Fedora 17 freeze (which will come shortly).

So, regarding the acceptance process, the only thing you have to do for now (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Milestones), is:
"1. The Feature Owner adds the feature page to Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler by adding the following text to the bottom of their feature page: Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler--it is already in the feature template."

Note that you can also refer to the features submitted by similar projects: OpenStack (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OpenStack), (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Aeolus_Conductor), Sheepdog (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sheepdog) and HekaFS (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HekaFS) for Fedora 16, as well as BoxGrinder (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BoxGrinder) for Fedora 15.

Does it seem clearer?

Best regards

Denis




--
Jaime Melis
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing
www.OpenNebula.org | jmelis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

[Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net