Re: Ceph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 7:59 PM, David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I spent some time today trying to get ceph updated, and I pushed 0.37
> to rawhide[0].
> I would like to solicit thoughts on pushing this to F16.
> While this fixes 5 bugs in Fedora's bug tracker (and to be fair, 2 of
> them are easily fixed in the current version) there are a number of
> bugs fixed in the 4 months since 0.31 was released.
> The downside - a number of binaries and libraries have changed name[1],
> Technically this probably runs afoul of the updates policy, but ceph
> appears to be a leaf package if repoquery is to be believed, and it's
> still on the same major version number :). It's also true that there
> isn't really the idea of a supported version of Ceph since it's still
> very rapidly in development and considered quite bleeding edge.

If it's a leaf package, I really don't have a problem with it. (Take
that with 4 teaspoons of salt, given my vast packaging and policy

My question is: I am looking at the roadmap - seeing that .39 is due
in a week - and wondering just how often we'll want to update?

> Thoughts, comments, flames?
> --David
> [0]
> [1]
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cloud mailing list

[Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux