Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Ceph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Hi folks,

I spent some time today trying to get ceph updated, and I pushed 0.37
to rawhide[0].

I would like to solicit thoughts on pushing this to F16.
While this fixes 5 bugs in Fedora's bug tracker (and to be fair, 2 of
them are easily fixed in the current version) there are a number of
bugs fixed in the 4 months since 0.31 was released.
The downside - a number of binaries and libraries have changed name[1],
Technically this probably runs afoul of the updates policy, but ceph
appears to be a leaf package if repoquery is to be believed, and it's
still on the same major version number :). It's also true that there
isn't really the idea of a supported version of Ceph since it's still
very rapidly in development and considered quite bleeding edge.

Thoughts, comments, flames?

--David

[0] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3491795
[1] http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&m=131673402621436&w=2
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud



[Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net